Centralised or decentralised cryptocurrency<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
In order to answer this question, a distinction must first be made between a centralised and decentralised cryptocurrency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
For example, a direct refund for central cryptocurrencies such as Tether (USDT) - should fraud be proven - can often be realised relatively easily. This usually requires proof of origin of the cryptocurrency, such as the original deposit information of the crypto exchange.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
It is also necessary for the further tracking of cryptocurrencies to be documented in a legally correct manner. This is important for Tether, for example, in order to destroy the stolen cryptocurrencies or to make restitution possible in the first place.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Finally, it is also necessary to document the fraud by means of a communication history. In most cases, the cryptocurrencies are then virtually frozen until the incident is resolved. The probability of successfully recovering the funds is high in this case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
With decentralised cryptocurrencies, an immediate refund is not easily possible. Decentralised here means that the blockchain cannot be manipulated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The procedure for recovering lost decentralised cryptocurrencies is similar to that for centralised cryptocurrencies, but focuses on crypto exchanges. Once the cryptocurrencies have been localised, the wallets are reported. Many crypto exchanges are guided by such reports (AML) and then require the affected wallet owners, for example, to undergo a more stringent KYC check or provide proof of origin for the assets before the funds are transferred or exchanged.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Crypto retrieval often fails due to the authorities<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Once the police have been notified, the public prosecutor's office can confiscate the assets from the crypto exchanges concerned, which usually cooperate. As already mentioned, this requires legally correct tracking and localisation of the cryptocurrencies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Unfortunately, the investigation by the law enforcement authorities is very slow due to capacity utilisation. However, the time factor plays a decisive role in the investigation and seizure of assets. As things stand at present, the investigation and localisation of assets in fraud cases by law enforcement authorities is virtually non-existent.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The authorities usually stop the investigation or postpone it for years. For understandable reasons, trained personnel are preferably deployed in money laundering, tax evasion and terrorist financing cases in order to conserve resources. Unfortunately, the limited capacity of law enforcement authorities and the very time-consuming nature of crypto forensics often mean that private investors cannot be prioritised sufficiently.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
On the basis of a forensic report, the public prosecutor's office can force crypto exchanges, which generally cooperate with the EU anyway, to hand over the funds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Private investors who are victims of fraud should be careful when choosing legal assistance and obtaining a forensic expert opinion. Victims' helplessness is often exploited and exorbitantly high prices are charged, even by supposedly reputable providers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Challenges and aggravating factors<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Tracing the original transactions is becoming increasingly difficult due to the growing number of swaps, bridges and 2-layer chains. However, modern software and forensic methods make it possible to trace the funds beyond doubt in the vast majority of cases.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Fraudsters often use false identities on crypto exchanges or use wallets without KYC regulations. However, modern heuristic analyses can often be used to determine information such as IP addresses, super cookies or device information of the perpetrators.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The owner of the assets usually changes, as the fraudsters generally favour cash in the short and medium term. This change of ownership complicates the tracking and confiscation of cryptocurrencies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
From a legal perspective, however, the assets were already stolen at the time of the exchange. The lost cryptocurrencies must therefore be treated as stolen goods, and victims of fraud still have a right to them even if they have already (unlawfully) changed hands.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The question of how many cases of stolen cryptocurrencies can be recovered as a percentage cannot be answered in general terms due to their complexity. The time factor is crucial and has a direct impact on the chances. In most cases, it is tedious but possible to recover the assets or part of them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Where can I get help?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n![\"Retrieve](\"https:\/\/krypto-investigation.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Favicon_New.png\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\nFor those affected by crypto fraud, qualified advice from crypto forensics experts, such as the Crypto Investigation<\/a>as well as by experienced lawyers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/krypto-investigation.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/logo-ru-law-300x78.png\")
<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\nDr Rogert from the law firm Rogert & Ulbrich Attorneys at Law in Partnership mbB<\/a> has already successfully supported numerous clients in dealing with crypto fraud cases.<\/p>\n\n\n\nFAQs \u2013 Frequently Asked Questions about Cryptocurrency Recovery<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
<\/figure>\n\n\n\nFor those affected by crypto fraud, qualified advice from crypto forensics experts, such as the Crypto Investigation<\/a>as well as by experienced lawyers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Dr Rogert from the law firm Rogert & Ulbrich Attorneys at Law in Partnership mbB<\/a> has already successfully supported numerous clients in dealing with crypto fraud cases.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\nFAQs \u2013 Frequently Asked Questions about Cryptocurrency Recovery<\/h2>\n\n\n\n